I said very little that isn't factually trueoldschoolwwwf wrote: ↑September 18th, 2018, 11:31 pmAlmost Sounds like a defense of bin laden. Definitely gonna stir controversy with that one..class316 wrote: ↑September 18th, 2018, 11:15 pmVery debtabtle who or what he served. Remember Bin Laden was basically a biproduct of the actions of traitorous American politicians (via US foreign policy). Also at one time Bin Laden was dubbed an anti soviet freedom fighter before he was dubbed a terrorist.
But again, not about fear or hiding. You admit you shot Bin Laden you expose yourself to people who want to avenge him. He could have just kept his mouth shut and lived normally. One time at a flight I heard he even asked combo hunters how is it that they find him when Isis can't.
A very unique meet (9/11 attacks related)
A very unique meet (9/11 attacks related)
Follow me on twitter https://twitter.com/celebmeets
Re: A very unique meet (9/11 attacks related)
You said it was debatable, then gave a foreign policy opinion NOT a fact. Furthermore, it's literally laughable to think ISIS or Al Qaeda would seek revenge on this guy. Had he shot a Russian Mafia ***cough*** government stooge, yeah, sure, but a guy who was hiding in a dump for several years. Ha ha ha.
The Paunch Stevenson Show pop culture podcast
Re: A very unique meet (9/11 attacks related)
He was kept in hiding for more than a decade he obviously had very loyal followers.Greg2600 wrote: ↑September 18th, 2018, 11:57 pm You said it was debatable, then gave a foreign policy opinion NOT a fact. Furthermore, it's literally laughable to think ISIS or Al Qaeda would seek revenge on this guy. Had he shot a Russian Mafia ***cough*** government stooge, yeah, sure, but a guy who was hiding in a dump for several years. Ha ha ha.
The foreign policy part is a fact not opinion. That's the reason he attacked the US and not (say) Canada or Switzerland
Follow me on twitter https://twitter.com/celebmeets
Re: A very unique meet (9/11 attacks related)
Wrong again. First, you called them "traitorous" which is an opinion NOT a fact. Second, LOL to the hiding. Come on. They couldn't find him for a decade after Cheney/Rumsfeld let him get away. Then Obama decided he should be taken out for real, and within a year, he was dumped in the sea.
The Paunch Stevenson Show pop culture podcast
Re: A very unique meet (9/11 attacks related)
The hunt for Bin Laden was a multi year ordeal. Took longer than a year. They had to gather different intel from many sources including but not limited to Guantanamo bay prisoners and piece them together.Greg2600 wrote: ↑September 19th, 2018, 1:18 am
Wrong again. First, you called them "traitorous" which is an opinion NOT a fact. Second, LOL to the hiding. Come on. They couldn't find him for a decade after Cheney/Rumsfeld let him get away. Then Obama decided he should be taken out for real, and within a year, he was dumped in the sea.
They spent US tax payer's money in the interest of other nations. Sounds like the definition of treason. And their actions angered people (such as Bin Laden, hence my point of him being a byproduct). If Canada had the same policies and had military bases in various Arab/Muslim nations, Al Qaeda would have attacked Canada.
Whatever one's opinion on the 9/11 attacks or Bin Laden, or even how one defines treason, the hard fact remains there was a solid reason behind the 9-11 attacks that motivated the attackers to a point to where they were willing to face their own deaths. Most one can argue is the reasoning doesn't justify killing all those innocent bystanders in the planes and buildings. The hijackers of those planes obviously felt otherwise. But either way, the reasoning behind the attacks is valid.
On a separate note, soon people who weren't alive during the 9/11 attacks will be graduating high school. To boot, I've had sex with legally aged girls who were too young to have any memories of the 9/11 attacks (and admitted to me as such). Wow I feel old
Last edited by class316 on September 19th, 2018, 2:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Follow me on twitter https://twitter.com/celebmeets
- billybatson22
- Full Fledged Mark
- Posts: 195
- Joined: June 5th, 2012, 3:32 pm
Re: A very unique meet (9/11 attacks related)
Between your knowledge of foreign affairs and your commentary about your sex life, in 2018 you would seem to be a perfect candidate to get into politics.
Re: A very unique meet (9/11 attacks related)
In all my years on the internet, on various message boards and social media platforms, I don't think I've ever met anybody who was more wrong (morally, ethically, factually, opinions, etc.) about more different things, than Class. It's truly mind-blowing how consistently wrong he constantly shows himself to be.
I guess we can add "defends 9/11" to the long list now.
I guess we can add "defends 9/11" to the long list now.
Re: A very unique meet (9/11 attacks related)
It's amazing how one can state factual things but still be "wrong" in your viewAJLe wrote: ↑September 19th, 2018, 9:10 am In all my years on the internet, on various message boards and social media platforms, I don't think I've ever met anybody who was more wrong (morally, ethically, factually, opinions, etc.) about more different things, than Class. It's truly mind-blowing how consistently wrong he constantly shows himself to be.
I guess we can add "defends 9/11" to the long list now.
Follow me on twitter https://twitter.com/celebmeets
Re: A very unique meet (9/11 attacks related)
You're literally rationalizing 9/11. Which means either:
1) You're trolling, in which case you're exploiting the country's worst terrorist attack in order to get people to argue with you on a message board, which would make you mentally ill.
OR
2) You're saying it because you actually believe it, in which case you're mentally ill.
Either way, rationalizing 9/11 is something so far off from sanity, it doesn't even require an argument.
Seek help. No, I'm not joking or insulting - you really need to seek help.
1) You're trolling, in which case you're exploiting the country's worst terrorist attack in order to get people to argue with you on a message board, which would make you mentally ill.
OR
2) You're saying it because you actually believe it, in which case you're mentally ill.
Either way, rationalizing 9/11 is something so far off from sanity, it doesn't even require an argument.
Seek help. No, I'm not joking or insulting - you really need to seek help.
Re: A very unique meet (9/11 attacks related)
Rationalizing nothing. US government actions was motivation behind the attacks. That's a fact and why it happened in the US (not Canada, Switzerland, Norway, etc). Nothing insane about seeing through lies and propaganda. Or do you believe what Bush said about being attacked "because of our freedoms"? (Legit question)AJLe wrote: ↑September 19th, 2018, 11:11 am You're literally rationalizing 9/11. Which means either:
1) You're trolling, in which case you're exploiting the country's worst terrorist attack in order to get people to argue with you on a message board, which would make you mentally ill.
OR
2) You're saying it because you actually believe it, in which case you're mentally ill.
Either way, rationalizing 9/11 is something so far off from sanity, it doesn't even require an argument.
Seek help. No, I'm not joking or insulting - you really need to seek help.
Follow me on twitter https://twitter.com/celebmeets
Re: A very unique meet (9/11 attacks related)
Wow, Want to feel old? Look how Millennials today are ignorant of the 9/11 attacks. No wonder many today support open borders. They fail to learn from history.
This video you will truly your jaw drop. Apparently Saddam Hussein was the main man responsible for the 9/11 attacks
This video you will truly your jaw drop. Apparently Saddam Hussein was the main man responsible for the 9/11 attacks
Follow me on twitter https://twitter.com/celebmeets